pe anti human cd11c (Elabscience Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Pe Anti Human Cd11c, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe anti human cd11c/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 3 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Co-delivery of sorafenib and an FSP1 inhibitor triggers dual ferroptosis in tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages for enhanced immunotherapy in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma"
Article Title: Co-delivery of sorafenib and an FSP1 inhibitor triggers dual ferroptosis in tumor cells and immunosuppressive macrophages for enhanced immunotherapy in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65056-9
Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of the induction of M2 TAMs, the 1-6/TAM spheroids formulation, the transwell co-incubation, and their respective treatments. b Western blot analysis of GPX4 and FSP1 expression in M2 TAMs after different treatments. The experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results. Uncropped blots in Source Data. c Quantification of grayscale intensity of GPX4 and FSP1 in ( b ) ( n = 3 independent experiments). Protein expression levels in PBS group were normalized to 1. d Live/dead staining of M2 TAMs after different treatments (Scale bar = 200 μm). Viable cells were stained with calcein-AM (green), and dead cells were stained with PI (red). The experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results. e Quantification of the percentage of viable and dead M2 TAMs in ( d ) ( n = 3 independent experiments). f Flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI)-stained M2 TAMs (gated on F4/80 + CD206 + macrophages) after different treatments. g Quantification of the percentage of apoptotic cells in ( f ) ( n = 3 independent replicates). The experiment was repeated twice independently with similar results. h The cell proliferation of M2 TAMs after different treatments measured by CCK8 ( n = 3 independent experiments). The concentrations of SF and vF contained in nanoparticles were both 3 μM. i Fluorescence images of C11 BODIPY 581/591 -stained M2 TAMs after different treatments (Scale bar = 100 μm). The experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results. j Fluorescence images of live/dead stained 1-6/TAM spheroids after different treatments (Scale bar = 500 μm). Viable cells were stained with calcein-AM (green), and dead cells were stained with PI (red). Z-stack scanning of the spheroids was performed with slices distanced by 14.36 μm. The experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results. k Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CRT-stained Hepa1-6 cells after different treatments. l Quantification of the percentage of CRT positive cells in ( k ) ( n = 3 independent replicates). The experiment was repeated twice independently with similar results. m The ATP assay of Hepa1-6 cells after different treatments ( n = 3 independent experiments). n The HMGB1 assay of Hepa1-6 cells after different treatments ( n = 3 independent experiments). o Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD80/CD86-stained BMDCs (gated on CD11c + DCs) after different treatments. p Quantification of the percentage of mature DCs in ( o ) ( n = 3 independent replicates). The experiment was repeated twice independently with similar results. q The assay of TNF, IL-6, and IL-12 in BMDCs after different treatments ( n = 3 independent experiments). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( c , g , h , l – n , p , q ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 5a were created by Adobe Illustrator.
Techniques Used: Formulation, Incubation, Western Blot, Expressing, Staining, Fluorescence, ATP Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: a Body weight of mice with intravenous treatments during a 28-day period ( n = 5 independent mice). b The blood analysis for the liver/kidney functions including ALT, AST, BUN, and CRE was determined on day 28 following the treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). c The curve of injected drug concentration (ID %) versus time point was plotted in subcutaneous HCC mice ( n = 6 independent mice). d Fluorescence imaging of the biodistribution in orthotopic HCC mice at 12 h after different treatments (tumors marked with yellow circles; n = 6 independent mice). e Tumor-to-background ratio for different treatments in ( d ) ( n = 6 independent mice). f Quantitative biodistribution analysis of DiR-labeled nanoparticles in major organs and liver tumors in ( d ) ( n = 6 independent mice). g Fluorescence images of Sv@PM-M2p inside HCC cells, M2 TAMs, M1 TAMs, DCs, and T cells in tumors ( n = 6 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). Sv@PM-M2p was labeled with Rhodamine (red), the nuclei and cell markers (HCC, CK8; M2, CD206; M1, CD86; DC, CD11c; T, CD3) were stained with DAPI (blue) and antibody (green), respectively. h Quantification of the percentage of colocated cells in ( g ) ( n = 6 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( c , e , f , h ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Injection, Concentration Assay, Fluorescence, Imaging, Labeling, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in subcutaneous HCC mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). d Quantification of fluorescence intensity in Supplementary Fig. f ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with anti-F4/80/CD206, anti-F4/80/CD86, and anti-CD11c/MHC II after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of the percentage of F4/80 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, F4/80 + CD86 + M1 TAMs, and CD11c + MHC II + actDCs in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Schematic illustration of the research procedure in orthotopic HCC mouse model. h Relative bioluminescence intensity curves for the various treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). i Animal survival after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). j Flow cytometric analysis of anti-F4/80/CD206-stained macrophages, anti-F4/80/CD86-stained macrophages, anti-CD11c/MHC II-stained DCs, anti-CD3/CD4-stained T cells, anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells, and anti-CD4/Foxp3-stained T cells in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) or log-rank test ( c , i ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 7a, g were created by Adobe Illustrator.
Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Immunofluorescence, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: a Schematic illustration of the research procedure in PDX subcutaneous mouse model. b Relative tumor volume curves of different treatment groups ( n = 5 independent mice). c Collected tumor tissues of mice at the end of treatment in different groups. d Tumor weight at the end of treatment in different groups ( n = 5 independent mice). e Immunofluorescence images of tumor tissue slices collected from different groups stained with Liperfluo after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice; Scale bar = 100 μm). f Quantification of fluorescence intensity in ( e ) ( n = 5 independent mice). g Flow cytometric analysis of anti-CD68/CD206-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-CD68/CD80-stained macrophages (gated on CD45 + cells), anti-HLA-DR/CD11c-stained DCs (gated on CD45 + Lin-1 – T cells), and anti-CD3/CD8-stained T cells (gated on CD45 + cells) in tumor tissues after different treatments ( n = 5 independent mice). h Quantification of the percentage of CD68 + CD206 + M2 TAMs, CD68 + CD80 + M1 TAMs, HLA-DR + CD11c + actDCs, and CD3 + CD8 + Tc cells in ( g ) ( n = 5 independent mice). Unless specified otherwise, error bars represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test ( b , d , f , h ) and P -values were indicated. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The elements in Fig. 9a were created by Adobe Illustrator.
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence
